Graphology (handwriting interpretation) is it legitimate or a generalization?

Graphology (handwriting interpretation) is it legitimate or a generalization?

Graphology claims to determine people’s psychological, social, occupational, and medical attributes from the configuration of their letters, lines, and paragraphs. Do you believe it is legitimate or do they use a generalization tactic? If you have a negative analysis can’t you just perfect undoing those flaws and merely change your handwriting? Please give me you’re opinion. Also, does anyone know any information on how to interpret handwriting? Is it difficult? I am very interested. Thank you!

[video]

This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 at 6:27 pm and is filed under Graphology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Graphology (handwriting interpretation) is it legitimate or a generalization?”